The Families First Coronavirus Relief Act (FFCRA) made substantial tax subsidies available to eligible employers, so they can provide paid sick leave and Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave for certain employees impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Eligible employers are those with fewer than 500 employees. An employer that has fewer than 50 employees may be able to make the case to the Department of Labor (DOL) that complying with rules would jeopardize the viability of his or her business as a going concern.
The subsidies, which take the form of refundable tax credits, are due to expire at the end of this year. However, it’s possible that those mandated benefits will be extended to the end of 2021. That’s one of the goals of legislation known as the Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency Solutions (HEROES) Act passed earlier this year in the U.S. House of Representatives. That overall legislation was rejected by the Senate as too costly (particularly provisions unrelated to paid sick leave). But it’s possible that a slimmed-down version will be enacted before year end.
Meanwhile, employers are still governed by the FFCRA today, as well as recent modifications. The DOL issued the original FFCRA regulations last spring. Then, in response to a ruling by the U.S. District Court for the Lower District of New York, the DOL issued updated regulations in September. That update could require you to adjust your company’s plans.
As a reminder, the FFCRA provided for paid leave (up to certain limits) for employees in two ways. First, as explained by the IRS, the Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act component provides up to 80 hours of paid sick leave if:
The second FFCRA component temporarily expands the scope of the FMLA. The expansion requires that eligible employers provide up to 10 weeks of paid, and two weeks unpaid, emergency family and medical leave to eligible employees, under certain conditions. That is, “if the employee is caring for his or her son or daughter whose school or place of care is closed or whose childcare provider is unavailable for reasons related to COVID-19.”
In August, the federal court in New York invalidated four elements of the DOL’s FFCRA regulations that:
1. Require employees to document their need for leave prior to taking it,
2. Allow employers to reject an employee’s request to take intermittent leave,
3. Stipulate that leave protections and benefits apply only when work is available, and
4. Include a very broad definition of “health care workers.” (Under the FFCRA, health care workers are ineligible for the expanded paid leave benefits.)
The DOL’s response to that ruling was to change some provisions and leave others intact with a more detailed legal justification.
Important: It’s not entirely clear whether employers outside the federal court district’s boundaries (the New York City metropolitan area) are affected by the court’s ruling.
Regarding the documentation issue, under the revised regulations, as summarized in a DOL series of questions and answers, a listed set of documents must be furnished “either orally or in writing … as soon as practicable,” even if it comes after the leave is granted.
On the intermittent leave question, the DOL maintained, but elaborated upon, its position and the legal rationale behind it. As matters stand, teleworking employees are given greater leeway in taking intermittent paid leave than those working at employer jobsites. The latter can only take a full day’s leave under several scenarios. Those scenarios include facing a quarantine requirement, experiencing COVID-19 symptoms, caring for an individual subject to a quarantine order, and “experiencing any other substantially similar condition specified by the Secretary of Health and Human Services.”
The DOL also stuck to its guns on its “work available” rule. That rule specifies that paid sick leave isn’t available to employees who had been furloughed without pay, even if their circumstances would have otherwise qualified them for paid leave. The federal court had questioned the legal basis for the DOL’s position, and the DOL expanded on its explanation in hopes of satisfying the court.
Finally, the DOL also narrowed its definition of “health care provider.” Specifically, instead of defining practically anyone working in a health care facility — including janitorial staff and food service workers — as health care providers, the revised rules define them more narrowly as providers who, among other things, “provide diagnostic, preventive, treatment services, or other patient care services.”
Whether Congress will extend FFCRA’s paid leave provisions beyond 2020 remains to be seen. It’s possible that Congress could act, and with the approval of the president, following the election and prior to the end of the year.